Services/Development/Mobile App Development

AI app development Australia

AI is a feature, not a product.

AI app development, Australia wide. The AI projects that work start with an expensive, repetitive task and ask whether a model can do it. Devika builds AI applications that survive contact with real users, real costs and real compliance.

4 weeksTypical proof of concept, with measured accuracy
AWSPartner, with data boundaries documented in writing
100%Onshore delivery, data in Australian regions by default
10 yearsShipping emerging technology into production

Most AI projects fail the same way

A team starts with the technology, goes looking for somewhere to apply it, and ships a chatbot nobody asked for. Six months later the enthusiasm is gone and the invoice is not.

The projects that work start at the other end. They begin with a task that is expensive, repetitive and currently done by a person who would rather be doing something else. Then they ask whether a model can do that task well enough, and what happens on the occasions when it cannot.

That second question separates a demo from a product. We start with the workflow every time.

Say it in one line

Do not start with the AI. Start with the task nobody wants to do, then ask whether AI can do it.

The vocabulary, in 90 seconds

You will hear these used interchangeably. They are not the same thing.

Machine learning.

A system that learns patterns from your historical data and applies them to new cases. Fraud detection, demand forecasting, matching candidates to roles, predicting which customers are about to leave. Machine learning apps are the right tool when you have data and want a prediction or a ranking.

Generative AI.

Models that produce new content: text, images, code, structured summaries. Generative AI apps are the right tool when you want something drafted, summarised, classified or explained.

LLM, or large language model

The class of model behind most generative AI. It predicts likely text with remarkable fluency. Fluency is not accuracy, which is why the design around it matters more than the model choice.

RAG, or retrieval-augmented generation.

Before answering, the system retrieves relevant passages from your documents and instructs the model to answer from those. This is the standard pattern for an AI that knows our business, and it is the difference between a system that cites your policy manual and one that invents a plausible-sounding policy.

Agent.

An AI given tools and permission to take multi-step actions rather than just producing text. Powerful, and the point at which permissions and audit logging stop being optional.

Human in the loop.

A person reviews or approves before the output has consequences. The single most reliable safeguard in production AI, and the one most often cut for speed.

Plain English. Machine learning predicts. Generative AI drafts. RAG makes it answer from your documents instead of from the internet. A human in the loop stops the confident wrong answers from reaching a customer.

Where AI actually pays for itself

Patterns we see returning value quickly.

01

Document processing.

Extracting structured data from invoices, contracts, forms and PDFs that currently get retyped

02

Intelligent search.

Employees asking questions of your own documentation and getting sourced answers

03

Triage and routing.

Classifying inbound enquiries, tickets or applications so the right person sees them first

04

Matching.

Connecting supply and demand where the criteria are too nuanced for a filter

05

Drafting with review.

First-pass responses, reports and summaries a person edits rather than writes

05

Personalisation at scale.

Tailoring what each user sees based on their behaviour and goals, informed by real usage data

Where we will tell you to wait

Anything where a wrong answer has legal, medical or financial consequences and no human reviews it. Anything requiring data you have not collected yet. Anything where the honest answer is that a well-written rule would do the job for a fraction of the cost.

Say it in one line

AI is worth it where a fast rough answer that someone checks beats a slow perfect one.

How we build

AI software development at Devika follows a deliberately short first loop. Our AI app development services and custom AI application development engagements start the same way, whether the end product is a feature inside something you already run or a system of its own.

Use case selection.

We list candidate tasks, score them on value, feasibility and risk, and pick one. One, not five.

Proof of concept, in weeks.

Real data, real prompts, real evaluation. We measure accuracy against a set of cases you agree represent the job, and we report the number whether or not it flatters us. If it does not clear the bar, you find out before you have spent a build budget.

Product engineering.

This is where most of the work sits, and where most AI projects underinvest. Retrieval, evaluation harnesses, guardrails, fallback behaviour, cost controls, monitoring, and the interface that makes the output usable rather than merely available. It is the same discipline as our custom software development work, applied to a probabilistic component.

Deploy on infrastructure you control.

AWS, as an AWS Partner, with clear boundaries on where your data goes and which models see it, documented before build rather than after. Onshore delivery throughout, with data in Australian regions by default.

Monitor and improve.

Model behaviour drifts and providers change underneath you. AI systems need active ownership rather than a handover, which is why most AI engagements move into managed support at launch.

Plain English. The model is maybe 20 per cent of an AI product. The other 80 per cent is making it reliable, affordable and usable, and that 80 per cent is normal software engineering, which we have been doing for a decade.

Governance, data and risk

The questions a board or risk committee will ask, answered before they ask them.

Where does the data go.

Documented per system. Options range from models running inside your own AWS account to commercial APIs under contractual no-training terms. We write down which components see which data classes.

Residency.

Australian AWS regions by default. Where a model provider cannot meet that, we say so before you commit rather than after.

Auditability.

Every AI-assisted decision that has consequences is logged with its inputs, its output and the human who approved it.

Evaluation.

A held-out test set agreed with you, run before every release, so quality regressions are caught rather than discovered by customers.

Human review.

Defined thresholds for what routes to a person, and a defined person.

Frameworks.

We can map controls to Australia's AI Ethics Principles and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework where your governance process expects it.

Native app development, decoded

A native app is built to run directly on the phone's operating system rather than inside a browser wrapper. It gets full access to the camera, GPS, push notifications, biometrics, offline storage and the hardware acceleration that makes scrolling feel like glass instead of sludge.

There are three broad options and the terminology gets muddied constantly.

Approach

What it is

Best for

Fully native
Separate Swift (iOS) and Kotlin (Android) codebases
Heavy graphics, AR and VR, deep OS integration
Cross-platform native
One codebase in React Native, compiled to genuinely native components
Most apps. Near-native feel, one team
Web wrapper
A website in an app-shaped box
Almost nothing. It feels wrong and users notice

Plain English. Native is about how the app feels, not just what it is written in. Cross-platform tools now produce native-feeling apps from one codebase, which is why we default there unless a project genuinely needs otherwise.

Our native mobile app development services default to cross-platform for that reason. We recommend fully native when the workload demands it, as we did for our AR and VR builds, and we say so plainly when it does not.

Generative AI app development for startups

If you are a founder, the pressure to have an AI story is real and mostly unhelpful. Two things are worth knowing.

Your defensibility is not the model. You are using the same models as everyone else. What is yours is proprietary data, workflow ownership, distribution, and the accumulated judgement encoded in how your product handles edge cases.

Token costs are a unit economics problem, not a line item. An AI feature costing $0.40 per user per day inside a $15 monthly subscription is a business model that does not close. We model cost per user during the proof of concept, alongside your burn rate, before it becomes a surprise.

Our AI work for startups runs on the same rapid MVP process as the rest of our engineering.

Say it in one line

Everyone has the same models. Your moat is your data, your workflow and your distribution.

Proof

We have been building intelligent and emerging-technology products since well before the current wave.

Wholii

NDIS compliance, generative AI on AWS

A compliance and workflow platform for NDIS providers, built out of one provider's hard-won internal process and turned into multi-tenant SaaS for the sector. Staff capture information by talking. Amazon Transcribe handles voice intake with NDIS-specific vocabulary, Amazon Textract reads uploaded forms, and Amazon Bedrock drafts form templates and structured responses from documents and transcripts.

Every suggestion is reviewed and accepted by a person before a record is finalised, which is human in the loop working exactly as described above rather than as a principle. A 6-month MVP on Baseline, preceded by a proof of concept and followed by ongoing managed services.

“Onboarding a participant used to take two or three days.”
Hashim Ahmed, Founder, Wholii

An hour of conversation now produces the care plan, the service agreement and the audit evidence, formatted the way an auditor expects to see it.

Read the case study→‍

HopStep

Aged care recruitment, algorithmic matching

A platform tackling Australia's aged care workforce shortage. The core of the product is a matching system that connects healthcare employers with suitably qualified candidates in a sector that had been slow to adopt technology at all. Devika built it on Baseline, then Devika Ventures invested in the business.

Read the case study→‍

Glean

Health and fitness, personalisation at scale

A platform delivering individualised plans at scale, accounting for each user's lifestyle, preferences and goals, across web and mobile with coach and admin portals on AWS. Personalisation engineering applied to a business that could not otherwise have scaled past its founders' available hours.

Read the case study→‍

ArkiCity

Urban planning, augmented reality

Collaborative city planning in AR, built with React Native and Apple ARKit, letting residents project design proposals onto real landscapes. Tested with Wollongong City Council, Liverpool City Council and City of Canterbury Bankstown.

Read the case study→‍

Common questions

Do we need our own data to build an AI app?+

For machine learning, generally yes. For generative AI, often no. Retrieval lets a model answer from your existing documents without any training. If your knowledge lives in PDFs and wikis, you have more to work with than you think.

Where does our data go?+

That is a design decision we make with you and document before build. Options range from models running inside your own AWS environment to commercial APIs with contractual no-training guarantees. Australian regions and onshore delivery by default.

How do you stop it making things up?+

Retrieval grounds answers in your source documents. Evaluation against a held-out test set catches regressions before release. Confidence thresholds route uncertain cases to a person. And for anything consequential, human review before the output has effect.

What does an AI app cost to run?+

Ongoing model costs are real and usage-based. We model cost per user during the proof of concept so the unit economics are known before you commit to a build.

Can you add AI to our existing product?+

Frequently the better move. A well-chosen AI feature inside a product people already use beats a new AI product nobody has heard of.

What if the proof of concept fails?+

You have spent the smallest amount available to learn that, and you have a measured accuracy figure explaining why. We would rather deliver that result than a build you regret.

Related services

Custom software development,

the engineering discipline underneath every AI product we ship

Explore→

MVP and rapid prototyping

the fastest route from proof of concept to something real users touch

Explore→

Support and maintenance

active ownership after launch, since models drift and providers change

Explore→

Mobile app development

putting an AI feature in front of users on a phone

Explore→

UI/UX design

designing an interface that makes model output usable rather than merely available

Explore→

Bring the task, not the technology

We will tell you whether AI is the answer, what it would take, and what it would cost to run.